torsdag 4. april 2013

Lesson from PhD Course: Writing a scientific text

Lessons from Magne Nylenna, Kunnskapssenteret: 


The setup of a publication

  • Introduction
    • Three paragraphs:
      • What is known
      • What is unknown
      • What is your plan
    • Catch the interest of the reader and help him or her understand
    • Start with a quote, a definition, a scenario
  • Materials and methods
    • Study design
    • How, what, when, and where
    • Data analysis
    • Aim for six paragraphs
  • Results
    • Aim for six paragraphs
    • systematic presentation of findings
    • A logical order: general to detailed
    • Use tables and figures; do not state the same facts twice.
  • Discussion
    • 6-7 paragraphs
    • Structure:
      • summarize main findings
      • the limits and strengths
      • interpretation of results
      • importance of the study
    • End with a clear message

"Kill your darlings"

  • Make your title better.
    • Informative and exciting
    • be careful with conclusions
    • wait until the final manuscript; use a working title
    • A question in the title must be answered in the text
    • Form example: "An exciting statement: An explanation of the text"


Lesson from PhD Course: Publishing


Lessons from Richard Horton, Editor of the Lancet

  • The forces of publication
    • Open Access: Science should be accessible for everyone, especially since the public paid for it by way of taxes
    • Impact: Brand names of universities are built by publications. More publications mean better recognition.
    • Liars, cheats & fraud: Science is not better than any other area, it has it's fair share of bottomfeeders.
  • What do journals want in the articles they publish?
    • Originality; is anything new brought to the table?
    • Relevancy: is the disease discussed in media? 
    • Readership: are the main readers of the journal going to be interested?
    • Then - and only after this - do the journals consider the truthfulness of the research.
    • Open access publications like PLOS One have a bias to publish more, especially research that may have been turned down in higher impact journals like the Lancet or BMJ.

  • Think about the message you want to convey
  • Be actively engaged in the publishing process
  • Convey passion for your work in in the paper and in the cover letter.

fredag 22. februar 2013

Shetlandsponnier i lusekofte



Denne går kanskje ikke inn under hverken burger eller vitenskap. 
Det gjør ingenting.
Ingen trenger å være regelrytter her på haugen.